Hin-Tak Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > Data frames have unique row names *by definition* (White Book p.57).
>
> Yes - I happened to have the White Book on my desk (not mine...)
> - indeed, the first sentence on page 57 is (quote verbatim, the
> "never" is in ital
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Data frames have unique row names *by definition* (White Book p.57).
Yes - I happened to have the White Book on my desk (not mine...)
- indeed, the first sentence on page 57 is (quote verbatim, the
"never" is in italic in the book, which I have added the "*" before and
t;transform.data.frame" "unique.data.frame"
"unstack.data.frame""xpdrows.data.frame"
But I think the changes would be quick to make. Is anything else effected?
Do any test suites exist to confirm R hasn't broken?
On the face of it allowin
"subset.data.frame"
"summary.data.frame""t.data.frame"
[65] "transform.data.frame" "unique.data.frame"
"unstack.data.frame""xpdrows.data.frame"
>
But I think t
I believe Gabor was referring to this:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/05/05/0837.html
Andy
From: Hin-Tak Leung
>
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > There was nothing attached in the copy that came through
> > to me.
>
> I like to see that patch also.
>
> > By the way, there was some dis
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> There was nothing attached in the copy that came through
> to me.
I like to see that patch also.
> By the way, there was some discussion earlier this year
> on a light-weight data.frame class but I don't think anyone
> ever posted any code.
It may have been me. I am w
There was nothing attached in the copy that came through
to me.
By the way, there was some discussion earlier this year
on a light-weight data.frame class but I don't think anyone
ever posted any code.
On 12/9/05, Matthew Dowle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please see below for post on r
Hi,
Please see below for post on r-help regarding data.frame() and the
possibility of dropping rownames, for space and time reasons.
I've made some changes, attached, and it seems to be working well. I see the
expected space (90% saved) and time (10 times faster) savings. There are no
doubt some
