Would this not be the case *for* a new package?
FWIW I would much prefer packages maintainers who make significant changes
also change the name of the package (e.g. to survival2). That way
disturbance is minimized and the package’s developers can add features and
refactor their code much faster.
On 6/1/19 1:32 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Jun 1, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Peter Langfelder
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:22 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
wrote:
In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly
compatable
change to the survfit object.
