Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Seth" == Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:06:24 -0700 writes:
>
> Seth> Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> An internal environment variable called
> >>
> >> _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_
>
On 8/31/2006 3:40 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "Seth" == Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:06:24 -0700 writes:
>
> Seth> Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> An internal environment variable called
> >>
> >> _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_
>
> "Seth" == Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:06:24 -0700 writes:
Seth> Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> An internal environment variable called
>>
>> _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_
>>
>> which controls this has been in place for qui
On 8/30/2006 2:13 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 8/30/2006 12:28 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>>> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 8/30/2006 4:44 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 8/30/2006 12:28 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>> On 8/30/2006 4:44 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL P
On 8/30/2006 12:28 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 8/30/2006 4:44 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
"FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>>> >> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> >>>
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 8/30/2006 4:44 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>> >> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather th
On 8/30/2006 4:44 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>
> >> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field in
> the
Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> An internal environment variable called
>
> _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_
>
> which controls this has been in place for quite some time now. One can
> trivially add a Perl R CMD check configure variable for it. I am a bit
> hesitant to add a --force-suggests
>> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>
> >> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field
> in the
> >>> DESCRIPTION. Currently a package cou
> On 8/30/2006 3:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On 8/29/2006 4:13 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> This doesn't address the problem of someone who hasn't got the package
>>> installed yet, though perhaps CRAN could put a version of that man page
>>> (or all
On 8/30/2006 3:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 8/29/2006 4:13 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>>> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> This doesn't address the problem of someone who hasn't got the package
>> installed yet, though perhaps CRAN could put a version of that man page
>> (or all of them
> Martin Maechler writes:
> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>>> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field in the
DESCRIPTION. Currently a
> Duncan Murdoch writes:
> On 8/29/2006 10:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>> "PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
>>
PaulG> Martin Maechler wrote:
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >> The idea was a field related to but weaker than 'Suggests' :
> "FrL" == friedrich leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
>> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field in the
>>> DESCRIPTION. Currently a package could be menti
> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field in the
>> DESCRIPTION. Currently a package could be mentioned for any of these
>> reasons:
>>
>> 1. To make functions, examples or vignettes work
>> 2. To allow optional functionality
> On 8/29/2006 4:13 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
[...]
>
> This doesn't address the problem of someone who hasn't got the package
> installed yet, though perhaps CRAN could put a version of that man page
> (or all of them) online for browsing. Unfortunately this hasn't
> h
On 8/29/2006 4:13 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 8/29/2006 2:24 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> Seth Falcon wrote:
>>>
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
>
>
>> I think there is an im
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 8/29/2006 2:24 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Seth Falcon wrote:
>>
>>> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
> I think there is an important distinction between a dependency needed
> for
On 8/29/2006 2:24 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> Seth Falcon wrote:
>
>>Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>>On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
>>>
>>>
I think there is an important distinction between a dependency needed
for the package to function and a dependency
Seth Falcon wrote:
>Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I think there is an important distinction between a dependency needed
>>>for the package to function and a dependency needed to demonstrate
>>>said functionality via an exa
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
>> I think there is an important distinction between a dependency needed
>> for the package to function and a dependency needed to demonstrate
>> said functionality via an example or vignette. The former is what
On 8/29/2006 1:05 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 8/29/2006 10:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
"PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
>>>
>>>
>>> PaulG> Martin Maechler wrote:
>>> >> ...
>
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 8/29/2006 10:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
>>> "PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
>>
>>
>> PaulG> Martin Maechler wrote:
>> >> ...
>> >> >> The idea was a field related to but wea
On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field in the
>> DESCRIPTION. Currently a package could be mentioned for any of these
>> reasons:
>>
>> 1. To make functions, examples or vignettes
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we need an option to R CMD check rather than a new field in the
> DESCRIPTION. Currently a package could be mentioned for any of these
> reasons:
>
> 1. To make functions, examples or vignettes work
> 2. To allow optional functionality in fu
On 8/29/2006 10:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
>
> PaulG> Martin Maechler wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> The idea was a field related to but weaker than 'Suggests' :
> >> Somethi
Martin Maechler
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:13 AM
To: Paul Gilbert
Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [Rd] 'CanMakeUseOf' field [was ".. Add 'fields' argument
..]
>>>>> "PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>&g
>> "PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
>
>PaulG> Martin Maechler wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The idea was a field related to but weaker than 'Suggests' :
>>> Something like
>>> 'canMakeUseOf: [, , ... ]
>>> w
> "PaulG" == Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
PaulG> Martin Maechler wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> The idea was a field related to but weaker than 'Suggests' :
>> Something like
>> 'canMakeUseOf: [, , ... ]
>> which is *n
30 matches
Mail list logo
