I am struggling to get Quarto producing a list of figures from a Quarto
book.
Where may I find a working sample to get inspiration from?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/lis
Hello
Just wondering what is the best way to manage unix signal in R?
Though I dug up the R documentation, I haven't found any single relevant
example.
I could wrap C/C++ unix signal management using RCPP of course.
Prior doing so, I wish to be sure that there exist no other available
alternativ
Hi R gurus
Got an issue risen by CRAN about using unknown characters from Latex.
Here is the error message
*Check: PDF version of manual, Result: WARNING LaTeX errors when creating
PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found:
! Undefined control sequence.
@steve
Seek for online document named "writing R extensions" chapter 2. It tells
how to describe a list structure using item markup for R documentation
files, if indeed this matches your search, thing I am not sure. Something
that looks like...
value{
The \\code{list} owns following names
\\item{
; not to be considered.
>
> ggplot2 ?
>
> Numbers are allowed in package names right now.
>
>
> > Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 20:41, Gabriel Becker a
> > écrit :
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:05 AM neonira Arinoem
> >>
(c) it wasn't one of the cuteR variety.
>
> Bonus points for the first analysis of case conventions in existing
> CRAN package names ... I'll start.
>
> > a1 <- rownames(available.packages())
> > cute <- "[a-z]*R[a-z]*"
> > table(grepl(cute,a1))
&g
écrit :
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:05 AM neonira Arinoem wrote:
>
>> Won't it be better to have a convention that allows lowercase, dash,
>> underscore and dot as only valid characters for new package names and keep
>> the ancient format validation scheme for olde
Won't it be better to have a convention that allows lowercase, dash,
underscore and dot as only valid characters for new package names and keep
the ancient format validation scheme for older package names?
This could be implemented by a single function, taking a strictNaming_b_1
parameter which de
Good evening R devel mailing list.
Just wonder if there is a way to ask for an evolution of the R language. In
affirmative case, let me know.
I use R for now many years, and still like it very much. It evolves quite
smoothly and improves well. Nevertheless, there is one topic that I still
miss in
