reason, that is why I tried copying the instruction directly in R and
thus getting this problem.
So that is strange if you say that there is no limit using rjava/jri.
Cheers,
Jean
Cheers,
Simon
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 01/12/2009 12:50 AM, Jean Couteau wrote:
Thanks for your time Duncan,
I
long.
Best regards,
Jean
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 01/12/2009 12:50 AM, Jean Couteau wrote:
Thanks for your time Duncan,
I join here the instruction that is not correct, hoping that might
help you. The file is encoded in utf-8 so you should not have any
problem reading it.
I doubt to that
,
Jean Couteau
Your message has encoding problems, so it's not readable. Could you
put the code online somewhere where we could download it in its
original form? I doubt if this is an R bug, but I can't point out the
problem in your code (or confirm that it really is an R bug) w
on (I need to add two=20
parenthesis at the end so that it can be evaluated, but do not give me=20
the right results).
I replaced the factors vector by its size (the morris method allows=20
that) and the evaluation is ok (with right results).
I tryed also replacing the binf and bsup vectors by a single value=20
(authorized by the morris function also), leaving the factors vector,=20
and the evaluation is also ok (so it is not the factors vector that is=20
creating the problem).
This seems really odd to me and I cannot see where is the problem so I=20
am thinking about a R bug (even if the sensitivity package is not=20
loaded, i cannot enter the instruction, thus it is not a sensitivity=20
problem).
Did somebody already encountered such a bug (if it is a bug) ?
I am using R 2.9.2 under linux/Xubuntu 9.10 and this has also been tried =
on R 2.9.0 on Windows 7.
I can provide more info if needed.
Jean Couteau
Code Lutin
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
