nvironment".
>
I am following the news in daily snapshots from here
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R
and the above line is still not in the NEWS of today's version.
Thanks for the patch. Looking forward to the stable release.
Vitally.
> On 10/22/10 10:20 AM, Vitally S.
7;
>>> Subject: Re: [Rd] Recursion error after upgrade to
>>> R_2.11.1[Sec=Unclassified]
>> It was due to a miscount of how many frames to go
>> up before evaluating an expression in
>> getMethod("[[<-",".environment") because setMe
Here is an infinite recursion error which occurs only with S4
subclasses assignment.
setClass("myenv", contains = "environment")
#[1] "myenv"
env <- new("myenv")
env[[".me"]] <- e...@.xdata
#Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion /
options(expressions=)?
With basic types
Here is an infinite recursion error which occurs only with S4
subclasses assignment.
setClass("myenv", contains = "environment")
#[1] "myenv"
env <- new("myenv")
env[[".me"]] <- e...@.xdata
#Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion /
options(expressions=)?
With basic types
Hadley Wickham writes:
> What's the correct way to create an object like this? (for example if
> you are manipulating the formals of a function to add an argument with
> no default value, as in
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3892580/).as.symbol("") returns an error.
> Both substitute()
Harold PETITHOMME writes:
Hi,
>
> there is no more an error.
> Why does my "object" disappear?
I cannot reproduce your problem.
Here is an example identical to yours:
setClass("foo", list(a = "character", b = "numeric"), proto = 100,
contains = "numeric")
setClass("boo", list(c = "num
