Re: [Rd] Build failure on powerpc64

2020-03-25 Thread Tom Callaway
y. AFAIR > (it's been more than a decade since I looked at this stuff) the RPM spec > files make it fairly easy to apply changes to the sources before building. > > -pd > > > On 25 Mar 2020, at 10:00 , Martin Maechler > wrote: > > > >>>>>>

Re: [Rd] Build failure on powerpc64

2019-12-13 Thread Tom Callaway
No, that does not change the issue: arithmetic.c:180:26: error: initializer element is not constant 180 | static LDOUBLE q_1_eps = 1.L / LDBL_EPSILON; Tom On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 11:56 AM Serguei Sokol wrote: > Le 13/12/2019 à 17:06, Tom Callaway a écrit : > > arithmetic.c: >

Re: [Rd] Build failure on powerpc64

2019-12-13 Thread Tom Callaway
tch and all of the tests pass on ppc64. Tom On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:44 AM Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> Tom Callaway > >>>>> on Thu, 12 Dec 2019 14:21:10 -0500 writes: > > > Hi R folks, > > > Went to build R 3.6.2 for Fedora/EPEL

[Rd] Build failure on powerpc64

2019-12-12 Thread Tom Callaway
Hi R folks, Went to build R 3.6.2 for Fedora/EPEL and got failures across the board. Disabling the test suite for all non-intel architectures resolves most of the failures, but powerpc64 dies in the compiler, specifically here: gcc -m64 -I../../src/extra/xdr -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/

Re: [Rd] R Segfault reported in Fedora 17

2012-09-17 Thread Tom Callaway
On 09/17/2012 01:55 PM, peter dalgaard wrote: > Very hard to find this sort of bug without reproducibility instructions. I agree, especially if the bug is in readline somewhere. > But the bug report says that it is a SIGABRT, not SIGSEGV. That's a different > kettle of fish isn't it? Yep. It su

[Rd] R Segfault reported in Fedora 17

2012-09-17 Thread Tom Callaway
Full details, including all sorts of logs here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857655 A very quick look doesn't show anything obvious, in fact, it might be a readline bug, but readline is remarkably stable and boring these days. ~tom == Fedora Project _