engineers, and I think
> this would be worth doing.)
>
> Best,
> Kevin
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:16 PM Timothy Goodman
> wrote:
> >
> > Since my larger concern is being able to conveniently select and re-run
> part of a multiline pipeline, I don't think
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:03 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote: Then I could run any number of lines with pipes at the
> > start and no special character at the end, and have it treated as a
> > single pipeline. I suppose that'd need to be a feature offered by the
> > environment (RStudio's RNotebooks in
cal
"submit selected code ignoring line-breaks" feature when running just the
first part of the pipeline -- i.e., selecting full lines, but starting
after the opening paren so as not to need to insert a closing paren.
- Tim
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:12 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On
they don't work. And parens
> have the side effect of removing invisibility from the result (which is
> a design flaw or bonus, depending on your point of view). So I actually
> wouldn't advise this workaround.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
> On 09/12/2020 12:45
Hi,
I'm a data scientist who routinely uses R in my day-to-day work, for tasks
such as cleaning and transforming data, exploratory data analysis, etc.
This includes frequent use of the pipe operator from the magrittr and dplyr
libraries, %>%. So, I was pleased to hear about the recent work on a
n
