I see in the archives significant discussion about SAS, CDISC formats etc.
for FDA, but no direct suggestion of adding a write.xport method to the
foreign package. Are there significant barriers to doing so?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
Martin,
I added "importFrom(reshape, cast)" to NAMESPACE; package now survives R
CMD check.
Thanks for your help!
-Tim
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
> On 02/02/2013 02:34 PM, Tim Bergsma wrote:
>
>> r-devel,
>>
>> In a development ve
ms to suggest that no function skeleton is
needed when creating a generic for a function defined in some other
package. I found one or two previous related posts, but no obvious
resolution.
Comments appreciated,
Tim Bergsma, PhD
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
Hi.
I'm maintaining a package that creates an object that is essentially a
classed version of numeric. I updated recently from 2.7.1 to 2.9.0,
and merges involving my class suddenly took a huge performance hit.
I've traced the problem to something near rank(). From NEWS, it seems
rank() etc. cha
#x27;t believe this is a Windows/Unix issue, but rather one of the
> local R environment.
>
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Tim Bergsma wrote:
>
>> Duncan,
>>
>> Yes, that was a typo on line three. Sorry.
>>
>> $version.string
>> [1] "Version 2.3.1 (2006
Duncan,
Yes, that was a typo on line three. Sorry.
$version.string
[1] "Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01)".
Thanks,
Tim.
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 08/06/2007 4:01 PM, Tim Bergsma wrote:
>> I normally work in Windows, but make my packages under Unix. My
>> package '
I normally work in Windows, but make my packages under Unix. My package
'b' suggests my package 'a'. R CMD check fails for 'b', even though 'a'
is installed: "Packages required but not available: b". What do I have
to do to make 'a' available, besides R CMD INSTALL 'a'? I'm not
spotting the
Dear Ulf Martin,
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis regarding the use of S3 data
frames in S4. I asked the same question (in a more rudimentary manner)
on the r-help list on 30 Nov 2006 and 04 Dec 2006. There were no
replies. If you find a solution, please post.
Best Regards,
Tim
Hi.
I'm trying to find a systematic way to prevent assignment to names of
existing functions. I've tried reassigning to the assignment operator,
with mixed results. The function definition for "<-" below works as
hoped for the demonstrated assignments to a and c. However, for the
assignment