On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 22:33 +0200, Uwe Schmitt wrote:
> The question is, if I am allowed to distribute the R.dll and the
> related libraries together with my software, or
> if it is better to ask the user to install these himself.
By principle it is better *not* to bundle libraries into the softw
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 12:13 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> And the simplest way to get a minimal list would be to
> look in the spec file for the Fedora SRPM.
See:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=R.git;a=blob_plain;f=R.spec;hb=HEAD
Pierre
___
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:35 -0500, Max Kuhn wrote:
> Before I try to write any code, does anyone see any issues with this
> (or has it already been done)? Is this a ridiculous approach?
You are for sure not alone in this effort to package R. A number of RPMs
have already made their way into Fedor
Dear list,
Sorry for the noise but I have a question regarding the license used in
RUnit [1], I contacted the maintainer( burgerm -at- users -dot-
sourceforge -dot- net ) on March 20th but I have received no answer.
Could anyone help to solve this question ?
Basically, my problem is that the web
