On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:51:52AM +0200, rom...@r-enthusiasts.com wrote:
> In Rcpp we'd like to do something useful for types such as long long
> and unsigned long long.
...
> But apparently this is still not enough and on some versions of gcc
> (e.g. 4.7 something), -pedantic still generates the
I was compiling R on a system which admittedly was in the odd situation
that it declared a function in math.h, but didn't have the associated
implementation in libm, and the R 2.15.1 compilation failed.
It turns out that R_CHECK_FUNCS is rather less robust than the standard
AC_CHECK_FUNCS which ac
