Re: [Rd] significant digits (PR#9682)

2008-06-03 Thread Patrick Carr
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's easy to make mistakes in this, but a little outside-of-R > experimentation suggests those are the right answers. The number 12345 is > exactly representable, so it is exactly half-way between 12340 and 12350, so > 12340 is the right an

Re: [Rd] significant digits (PR#9682)

2008-06-03 Thread Patrick Carr
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are identical. My text above that is poorly worded. They're identical internally, yes. But in terms of the number of significant digits, 0.9 and 0.90 are different. And that matters