otal possible number you'll ever have is < INT_MAX), you could store them
> as factors. You get the speed of integers but the labeling of full "precision"
> strings. Factors are fast for joins.
>
> ~G
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Nicolas Paris wrot
,colClasses="character")
col1 col2
1 -1311071933951566764 toto
2 -1311071933951566764 tata
Am I comdemned to provide a R script with the data in order to exploit the
dataset ?
Le 20 janv. 2017 à 18h29, Murray Stokely écrivait :
> 2^53 == 2^53+1
> TRUE
>
> Which makes joining
hem as strings. If not, what sort of
> calculations do you plan on doing with them?
> Bill Dunlap
> TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Nicolas Paris wrote:
> > Hello r users,
> >
> > I have to deal with int8 data with
integer-that-can-be-stored-in-a-double).
> This is how long vector indices are (currently) implemented in R. If it's
> good enough for indices it's probably good enough for whatever you need
> them for.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> ~G
>
>
&
-463287495999648233
7675955260644241951
reference:
1. https://www.r-bloggers.com/r-in-a-64-bit-world/
--
Nicolas PARIS
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
