variable that corresponds to
the interaction term. Am I missing something? Is there a way to perform the
regression with the interaction in SPSS without computing the interaction as a
separate variable?
Best,
Nick
- Original Message -
From: "John Fox"
To: "Nick
m: "peter dalgaard"
To: "Viechtbauer Wolfgang (SP)" ,
"Nick Brown"
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Friday, 5 May, 2017 3:33:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Rd] lm() gives different results to lm.ridge() and SPSS
Thanks, I was getting to try this, but got side tracked by ac
ha ha ha).
Nick
- Original Message -
From: "peter dalgaard"
To: "Nick Brown"
Cc: "Simon Bonner" , r-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Friday, 5 May, 2017 10:02:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Rd] lm() gives different results to lm.ridge() and SPSS
I asked you before
umbers
have no particular external meaning in lm.ridge().
Kind regards,
Nick
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Bonner"
To: "Nick Brown" , r-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 May, 2017 7:07:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Rd] lm() gives different results to lm.ridge() and SPSS
Hallo,
I hope I am posting to the right place. I was advised to try this list by Ben
Bolker (https://twitter.com/bolkerb/status/859909918446497795). I also posted
this question to StackOverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43771269/lm-gives-different-results-from-lm-ridgelambda-0).
I a
