Dear Toby
I see no problem there. If you compute the mean and variance of err1 -
err2 which is what the paired test is working on then that might help to
see what is going on.
Michael
On 16/09/2024 15:47, Toby Hocking wrote:
Hi! I expected that t.test should report a very large p-value (clo
Dear Ivan
I was bitten by this recently but fortunately Rolf had beaten me to
writing a question. The one thing which really surprised me is that the
current message tells me how much space it would have saved if it had
compressed the files in which case my immediate response was "Well, why
d
Comments in line
On 13/03/2021 09:50, SOEIRO Thomas wrote:
Dear list,
I have some questions/suggestions about reshape.
1) I think a good amount of the popularity of base::reshape alternative is due to the complexity of
reshape documentation. It is quite hard (at least it is for me) to figure
Dear Terry
Option 2 looks the best to me. They have a relatively simple change to
make and there are only four of them.
Michael
On 16/02/2021 14:39, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
I am testing out the next release of survival, which involves running R CMD
check on 868
CRAN pac
Dear Samuel
Does the FAQ for Windows section 2.9 help you here?
Michael
On 07/04/2020 12:35, Samuel Granjeaud IR/Inserm wrote:
Hi,
I am not not sure whether this topic belongs to this mail list, but I
feel the subscribers here should be the right audience.
I noticed that the memory limit repor
I suppose it is too late to change the name but checkBuilt does not
immediately clarify to me what it does. It does not check whether I have
built a package for instance. Having read Duncan's post at least I now
know that I should set it as TRUE until the default is changed.
Michael
On 24/02/
I have mixed feelings about this. I used to find the sos package very
useful when I first started using it but as the number of packages has
grown I now find it gives me a huge list which takes a lot of time to
digest. This may of course reflect my rudimentary search term selection
skills.
Mi
I realise this is not directly related to the topic but if changes are
afoot would it be possible to make the use of any sort of news or
changelog more prominent in the documentation? I maintain one of the
CRAN task views and when someone updates his/her package it is much,
much easier for me t
Dear Willem
I maintain the MetaAnalysis CTV.
I have found it quite practicable to do this without special tools. I
use an editor for the XML. I use CRANberries to catch updates and I
usually email people to check I have understood a new package. People
also kindly email me occasionally with n
At 14:57 18/05/2014, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 18/05/2014 13:33, Michael Dewey wrote:
In fact my first vignette full stop.
I am intending to use Sweave. I have read the Sweave documentation and
section 1.4 of the extensions manual and apart from (a) do not use split
= TRUE (b) and include
separate .bib file?
I am not envisaging doing anything complex: text, formulae, some
tables and one figure plus a few references.
Michael Dewey
i...@aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk/home.html
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
commonly used
>> > > statistics, and the stars are just a simple graphical display of them.
>> > > I find some p-values to be useful, and the display to be harmless.)
>> > >
>> > > I think it's really unlikely the more extreme changes (i.e. dropping
>> > > show.signif.stars completely, or dropping p-values) will happen.
>> > >
>> > > Regarding stringsAsFactors: I'm not going to defend keeping it as is,
>> > > I'll let the people who like it defend it. What I will likely do is
>> > > make a few changes so that character vectors are automatically changed
>> > > to factors in modelling functions, so that operating with
>> > > stringsAsFactors=FALSE doesn't trigger silly warnings.
>> >
>> > __
>> > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>
> __
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Michael Dewey
i...@aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk/home.html
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
At 19:10 14/11/2012, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Nov 14, 2012, at 19:15 , Michael Dewey wrote:
> When I go ?reshape I get told, amongst other things
>
> new.row.names
> logical; if TRUE and direction = "wide", create new row names in
long format from the values of the
ut the behaviour, it does what I would
want and what seems to me to be the natural thing but I do not think
it is quite as documented.
R version 2.15.2 (2012-10-26)
Platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32-bit)
Michael Dewey
i...@aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
http://www.aghmed.f
sking us to read the help pages for you."
I can appreciate the sentiment in
fortunes('rtfm'). In this case, however,
"r.ookie" had RTFM (and said so), but evidently
the manual was not sufficiently clear.
Best Wishes,
Spencer Graves
Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
he documented behavior silently ...
I will submit this as a wishlist item shortly if no-one complains.
Ben Bolker
Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
gt;>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
>>> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Bengtsson
>>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:24 AM
>>> To: Duncan Murdoch
>>> Cc: r-devel; Michael D
At 16:24 12/04/2010, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 10:51 AM, Michael Dewey wrote:
>>
Just to draw a line under it my comment inline below
>> When I run R CMD check on a package I have recently started work
ve
curve(orfun(x, exp(estimate)), from = 0.001, to = 0.999, add = TRUE)
These are the only occurrences of 'x'.
Is it just telling me that I have never assigned a value to x? Or is
it more sinister than that? As far as I can tell the function does
what I intended.
Micha
f resource poor
countries. Consistent with that would be support for the use of
methods which anyone can reproduce without having to buy a licence.
Thanks,
Kevin
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
rom my environment
> rm(list=ls(all=T))
>
> inputs= c(0.3+0*(1:12) )
> (format(inputs,digits=3,scientific=T,collapse=" "))
[1] "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "
_
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
infrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://tr.im/y8y0 : search the graph gallery from R
|- http://tr.im/y8wY : new R package : ant
`- http://tr.im/xMdt : update on the ant package
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
a power of 1 here.
2. I've run empirical simulations and found that the power predicted by
pwr.t.test is correct and so it is clear that power.t.test is inaccurate.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://sta
do the same for later versions (the
manual mentions version 2 is coming)? What benefit will I gain?
Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
nges actually do *not* solve the problem entirely;
further note that (at least inside the sources), we now say that
duplicate levels will not just signal a warning, but an error in
the future.
As long as we don't want to allow factor() to fail --rarely --
I think (and that actually h
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.1/1961 - Release Date:
02/19/09 18:45:00
Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
27 matches
Mail list logo
