Thanks for the feedback, Uwe. Will try the most recent development version.
Best,
Mark Difford.
-
Mark Difford (Ph.D.)
Research Associate
Botany Department
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
Port Elizabeth, South Africa
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com
es:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] tools_2.14.0
-
Mark Difford (Ph.D.)
Research Associate
Botany Department
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
Port Elizabeth, South Africa
--
View this message in conte
Hi Uwe,
This is not a problem under Vista, using "a" development version (mine now
somewhat outdated).
Regards, Mark.
sessionInfo()
R version 2.9.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-01-22 r47686)
i386-pc-mingw32
locale:
LC_COLLATE=English_South Africa.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_South
Africa.1252
Dimitris Rizopoulos wrote:
>> in my opinion the point of the whole discussion could be summarized by
>> the question, what
>> is a design flaw? This is totally subjective, and it happens almost
>> everywhere in life.
This [what constitutes a design flaw, and the suggestion that all design
flaw
things and
they should not be so easily confused.
Regards, Mark.
Mark Difford wrote:
>
> Dimitris Rizopoulos wrote:
>
>>> in my opinion the point of the whole discussion could be summarized by
>>> the question, what
>>> is a design flaw? This is total
A huge thank you from me, too. Greg has said what should be said.
Every day I look at my PS and PDF output, think through the chain of effort
involved, from building the blocks to the packages that coordinate them, and
say WOW! R graphics just got better, with some fine decision making.
Reg
Hi Jeroen,
>> How could i use the model$terms to extract which coefficients belong to
>> which factor,
>> the way anova() does it?
There may be a simpler ("canned") way to do it, but why don't you debug
anova.lm to see how it does it?
##
methods("anova")
anova.lm
HTH, Mark.
Jeroen Ooms wrot
Hi Mike,
>> I was at a loss to understand the use of "/" until I looked in "An
>> Introduction [!] to R,"
>> where I found the explanation.
I am not with you on the [!], because the information is basically where you
are "complaining" that it isn't, viz in your face --- i.e. in the
introductory
hough it's not necessary anymore
(to have a truly smooth R). You really don't need it switched on if you
have decent anti-virus stuff &c.
Regards,
Mark Difford.
Dominick Samperi-2 wrote:
>
> Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> There is not a single R-Vista issue here (and no R issue
