sions after the change. Add
> > appropriate entries in the DESCRIPTION file, e.g.
> >
> > Depends: R (> 4.0)
> >
> > Another is to argue with R Core that this change to a really old
> > function is too hard to accommodate, and they should back it out, maybe
&g
Dear R Developers,
the new simplify argument in apply causes that my package (hsdar) does not
pass the
checks in R-devel.
The workaround, Kurt Hornik send me, is working for the R-code:
if("simplify" %in% names(formals(base::apply)))
do something
else
do something else
Unfortunately, I c
CRAN containing Fortran 90 source
code? If so, what specific things should I consider?
Thank you for your help
Lukas Lehnert
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
14, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Lukas Lehnert
>
> wrote:
> > Dear R-developers,
> >
> > in a new package, I'm currently working on, I tried to add a new method
> > to function "t.test". The new class, on which the method is based, is
> > called &qu
Dear R-developers,
in a new package, I'm currently working on, I tried to add a new method to
function "t.test". The new class, on which the method is based, is called
"speclib", so I defined the funcion for the new method as "t.test.speclib".
R CMD check now gives always a warning, that S3 met
