Preamble: I am in no way opposed to Perl in general - I love Perl and
probably always will.
R currently has Perl as both a build-time and run-time dependency. This
adds about 200 Mb, give or take, to the required environment size (as
measured in CentOS - looks like it might be a bit smaller in Ub
Duncan noticed that either the sending server (Gmail - shouldn't be the
case) or receiving server stripped out the attachment. Here it is again,
inline.
-Ken
===
>From 99766dd8f16804ecddc73f6169be3e42b916b8fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ken Williams
Date:
Here’s a patch that adds ‘seealso’ entries to Sys.time and system.time
docs, to help people who forget what the distinction is between them.
Patch was made against https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk@61454 .
-Ken
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
htt
appended to \code{_data}.
+
+ \code{transform.data.frame} also accepts the additional named
+ arguments that the \code{data.frame} function accepts,
+ e.g. \code{stringsAsFactors}.
}
\value{
The modified value of \code{_data}.
-
a doc patch but it'll take a few days, I'm traveling.
---
Ken Williams, Senior Research Scientist
Applied Mathematics Group, WindLogics Inc.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is for the s...{{dropped:7}}
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> -Original Message-
> From: Roebuck,Paul L [mailto:proeb...@mdanderson.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:03 PM
> To: R-devel
> Cc: Ken Williams
> Subject: Re: [Rd] [patch] giving library() a 'version' argument
>
> On 4/12/12 10:11 AM, Ken William
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:27 PM
> To: Ken Williams
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] [patch] giving library() a 'version' argument
>
> I haven
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:22 AM
> To: Ken Williams
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] [patch] giving library() a 'version' argument
>
> On 12-
> -Original Message-
> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:54 AM
> To: Duncan Murdoch
> Cc: Ken Williams; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] [patch] giving library() a 'version' argument
>
&
Apparently the patch file got eaten. Let me try again with a .txt extension.
-Ken
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:28 AM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: [patch] giving library() a 'version' argument
>
>
se let me know if anything's amiss, or of
course if there are reservations about the approach.
Thanks.
--
Ken Williams, Senior Research Scientist
WindLogics
http://windlogics.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may con
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> Also, I don't know what the typical response time has been on Bugzilla once
> a bug report is filed. Perhaps something could be noted there so that bug
> reporters might have some expectation that a comment/reply might be
> forthcoming withi
Hi,
A few days ago I filed a bug report on the unzip() function:
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14462
I haven't gotten any comments yet, so I thought I'd ask for comments
here. I also see on the description of R-devel that the list "also
receives all (filtered, i.e. non-
13 matches
Mail list logo
