Re: [Rd] Problem building DLL under Windows

2009-04-03 Thread Jon Senior
related to your code > (unless you use this feature outside of the standard R headers). OK. Thanks for your help. Looks like the next step is probably going to be combining both compilation steps into a single Makefile. I really hate Makefiles! :-( -- Jon Senior __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

[Rd] Problem building DLL under Windows

2009-04-03 Thread Jon Senior
ng it no easier to find no than in August 2007! Perhaps someone who understands this stuff (or has some experience of it) could provide a hint as to how to proceed. :-) Thanks in advance. -- Jon Senior __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Return values from .Call and garbage collection

2009-01-27 Thread Jon Senior
ation that > should have been protected but were not etc. Apologies one and all. Oleg was right. I was writing into a Matrix but my method for doing so was wrong. Error fixed, and now it's all behaving. Thanks. -- Jon Senior __ R-devel@r-pro

[Rd] Return values from .Call and garbage collection [Additional information added]

2009-01-27 Thread Jon Senior
ode, and the large dataset might make testing difficult. Thanks in advance -- Jon Senior __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

[Rd] Return values from .Call and garbage collection

2009-01-27 Thread Jon Senior
to the size of the matrix. Any ideas what steps I could take to proceed with this? Or other possibilities than those I've suggested? For reasons of confidentiality I'm unable to release test code, and the large dataset might make testing difficult. Thanks in advance -- Jon Se