hink I'd prefer to be clear about what "largest" means in the docs
> rather than dropping the absolute value, because if all entries are
> negative, your version sets the tolerance to 0.
On 12/16/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/15/2006 7:09 PM, John
I've noticed that the max.col function with the default "random"
option often gives unexpected results. For instance, in this test, it
seems clear what the answer should be:
> # second col should always be max
> x1 = cbind(1:10, 2:11, -Inf)
>
> # this works fine
> max.col(x1, "first")
[1] 2 2 2 2
