Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jason Vertrees wrote:
>
>> My question is: why does the paradigm of changing the type of a 1D
>> return value to an unlisted array exist? This introduces boundary
>> conditions where none need exist, thus making the coding
is one-dimensional be careful,
because the return type will not the be same as if it were otherwise.
Is this legacy or a valid, rational design decision which I'm not yet a
sophisticated enough R coder to enjoy?
Thanks,
-- Jason
--
Jason Vertrees, PhD
Dar
