On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:48:11PM -0800, Bill Dunlap wrote:
> Perhaps the parser should warn if you use return() at all. It is rarely
> needed and is akin to the evil 'GOTO' statement in that it makes the flow
> of control less obvious to the reader.
My experience is contrary to this, using retu
>From my rusty memory of X11 hacking, this should be elementary at
the X11 end of things -- something along the lines of adding key
event handling and responding to the Ctrl-W event.
There may be no need for this for X11, though, as the normal X11
way is to have the window manager manage such stuf
t; Faculty of Bioscience Engineering
> Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bio-Informatics
>
> tel : +32 9 264 59 87
> joris.m...@ugent.be
> ---
> Disclaimer : http://helpdesk.ugent.be/e-maildisclaimer.php
>
> [[alternative H
t (as the documentation
of fork demonstrates in an example, if I recall correctly).
Best regards, Jan
--
+- Jan T. Kim ---+
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| WWW: http://www.cmp.uea.ac.
eded".
> Any idea for that?
I think this is a dangerous direction of thought. Having a "terminator
if apparently needed" semantics of newline has already brought us the
inconsistency of if / else parsing inside and outside of blocks. No more
of that, please.
Best regards, Jan
--
+- J
