both computers, the increasing and decreasing order return approximately the
same results.
Best regards,
Jan Motl
> My thoughts too. PR 3486 is about simulated tables that theoretically have
> STATISTIC equal to the one observed, but come out slightly different, messing
> up the s
dn't the sort be in the increasing order rather than in the decreasing
order?
Best regards,
Jan Motl
PS: This post is based on discussion on
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47847295/why-does-chisq-test-sort-data-in-descending-order-before-summation
and the response from the post to r-
