>Still, if they have code that is compiled and linked to R at running
>time, then that code must be under the GPL. Again, this is the FSF
>?interpretation and certainly not R-core's, not even mine.
>[...]
Well, not quite. R.h RDefines.h and RInternals.h are LGPL, so as long as the
hooks go throug
Assuming that the foundation does not want to deviate from the FSF
interpretation, there would still be value in clarifying its position
vis-à-vis how the license applies to R specifically.
For example the FSF foundation claims that linking to a library (even in an
interpreted environment) makes
re I'm going astray (as I go astray often).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Barry Rowlingson
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:18 PM
To: Ian Fellows
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Possible GPL Violation
> It seems unl
Hi All,
I was cruising around today, and came across a company (ZumaStat) that adds
additional statistics functionality to SPSS.
>From the Website:
http://www.zumastat.com/robust_statistics.htm
"ZumaStat provides a user friendly interface to access powerful statistical
programs on robu
