emedy
> applies (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-admin.html#OS-X):
>
> 'Configure option --with-internal-tzcode is the default on OS X, as the
> system implementation of time zones does not work correctly for times
> before 1902 or a
dating the port to the current
release: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195783. I've
posted the summary of this thread there, thanks for your help.
Davor
Prof Brian Ripley writes:
> On 31/08/2015 16:26, Davor Cubranic wrote:
>> Prof Brian Ripley writes:
>>
>&
Prof Brian Ripley writes:
> Second, we don't have all the pertinent information such as the
> configure options used and the architecture (x86_64?). I am going to
> have to guess none as none were mentioned, but using --enable-R-shlib
> would be pertinent.
>
> On
The administration manual for the current release of R says in section 4.2,
Uninstalling under OS X:
"The installation consisted of three Apple packages:
org.r-project.R.Leopard.fw.pkg, org.r-project.R.Leopard.GUI.pkg and
org.r-project.x86_64.tcltk.x11”.
This is not the case with R 3.0.2 on OS
:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>
> > Small note: if you are using a recent version of OSX, then gdb is
> > essentially useless, but you can use llvm, which is nicer in many respects,
> >
On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> Small note: if you are using a recent version of OSX, then gdb is
> essentially useless, but you can use llvm, which is nicer in many respects,
> anyway.
What do you mean by this? Gdb is a debugger, and LLVM is a compiler
infrastructure. Perha
On 13-06-18 12:57 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
Coercing A to a complex matrix should make no difference, but makes
>eigen() return the wrong answer:
>
>>min(eigen(A+0i,T,T)$values)
>[1] -0.359347
>>
>
>This is very, very wrong.
Yep. I see this also on 10.6/7 (Snow Leopard, Lion) and 3.0.x, but
I don't see any warnings if MASS is listed in Suggests in the DESCRIPTION.
Davor
On 2013-02-25, at 1:28 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> To summarize, it appears that the only way to call functions from a
>> suggested package is by using either 'require' (which will dynamically
>> attach it) or the
I haven't gotten any complaints from "R CMD check" when I used Simon's
suggestion, even with "--as-cran" flag. Hadley's suggestion to use 'require'
also works, and its side-effect of attaching the other package can in some
applications be seen by the end user as a nice bonus, so I'll probably ha
On 2013-02-22, at 10:23 PM, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
>> On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:39 PM, David Winsemius wrote:
> [...]
>>> I've always wondered: How does lattice manage to use grid functions
>>> without putting them on the search path?
>
> Because lattice imports the grid package and has a NAMESPACE
If in my package "Foo" I call a function from another package "Bar" if it's
available, according to R-exts, this sounds like I should include "Suggests:
Bar" in package Foo's description. But the manual is silent on how to treat
Bar's namespace. Should I import it? If so, should this be conditio
On 2012-11-06, at 9:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> On 06.11.2012 17:55, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>>
>>> "Imports" means that symbols are imported form the namespace, so they
>>> are mandatory for the package to operate. "Suggests" means that
>>> symbols from the package are not required, but they a
On 2012-06-07, at 12:05 PM, Philip Johnson wrote:
> The X11 device driver does not provide the X window manager with an icon
> (_NET_WM_ICON) or, under some circumstances, with a class (WM_CLASS). This
> hinders usability under the new stable version of Ubuntu, which has a (new)
> user interfac
On February 10, 2012 09:11:35 AM Rainer M Krug wrote:
> But what I was thinking about (in my other post as well) is to include
> github (or any other git repo provider) into r-forge for the automatic
> creation of packages.
>
> So is there an easy way to kind of push a certain revision up to
> r-f
On 2011-07-23, at 5:57 AM, Alireza Mahani wrote:
> Another trick to reduce verbosity of code (and focus on algorithm logic
> rather than boilerplate code) is to maintain a global copy of variables (in
> the global environment) which makes them visible to all functions (where
> appropriate, of cour
On 2011-07-18, at 11:52 AM, Nipesh Bajaj wrote:
> Hi all, I am trying to understand the R's "environment" concept
> however the underlying help files look quite technical to me. Can
> experts here provide me some more intuitive ideas behind this concept
> like, why it is there, what exactly it is
On July 5, 2011 04:59:16 PM Hadley Wickham wrote:
> That's not a syntactically valid name - you use backticks to refer to
> names that are not syntactically valid.
I was too loose in my terminology: I meant that `x prime` is a valid name, but
as you said, it is not syntactically valid.
Davor
__
On June 30, 2011 01:37:57 PM Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Is there any easy way to tell if a string is a syntactically valid name?
[...]
>
> One implementation would be:
>
> is.syntactic <- function(x) x == make.names(x)
>
> but I wonder if there's a more elegant way.
This is without quoting, right
On 2011-05-06, at 11:41 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | I¹m trying to call some of my c++ code from R and seem to be having an issue
> | with streams, although that¹s just one obvious sign of something different
> | in performance between calling the same function from main in c++ vs.
> | calling
On 2011-04-09, at 2:08 PM, Ted Harding wrote:
> I think the right thing to so is to introduce the students to the
> basics of scoping, early in the process of learning R.
I know the basics of scoping perfectly well, but that doesn't stop me from
occasionally misspelling a variable name that only
On 2011-04-01, at 12:17 PM, Ted Byers wrote:
> Note, while I see the author's
> responsibility to write perfectly (or at least try), the reader also has a
> responsibility to work at determining what the author meant by what he or
> she wrote.
Most people don't read reference manuals to engage wi
In a conversation with a programmer new to writing R packages, he mentioned
that he was very confused by phrase "package writer" used in the document, and
said that he "[was] literally imagining some sort of function that writes
something related to packages".
I can see his point: not only is i
On 03/26/2011 12:19 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> ["Namespace dependency not required: lme4a"]
> I think "dependence" works better than "dependency" in English, too
I'm not a native English speaker, but "dependency" is a pretty standard
software engineering term for this kind of relationship. I.e., "lm
On 2011-01-23, at 4:34 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Vitalie S. wrote:
>> Gabor Grothendieck writes:
>>
>>> Also the gsubfn supports quasi perl style string interpolation that
>>> can sometimes be used to avoid the use of paste in the first place.
>>> Just pre
>> Just a clarification for posterity - R5 has nothing to do with the new
>> reference classes. It's not even an official name, but informally it's a
>> collection of ideas for an entirely new object system that can replace
>> both S3 and S4 (not that it will but it should be seen as having the
>>
On November 19, 2010 07:58:40 am Marko Robnik-Šikonja wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I am a maintainer of the CORElearn package which uses OpenMP
> multithreading to speed up some computations. When producing a new
> release we tested the package with the latest R 2.12.0. On Linux the
> package wor
> > You should not run configure or make with sudo. If you need to
> > install system-wide, you only need to run make install under sudo,
> > like
> > ./configure
> > make
> > sudo make install
>
> I thougt so, and did so first. But that generated other errors!,
> which was killed by using sudo.
On November 14, 2010 10:05:24 am Ron Burns wrote:
> [ 41 ] (ron) ls /usr/lib/libatlas*
> /usr/lib/libatlas.so.3gf@
> [ 42 ] (ron) ls /usr/lib/libf77blas*
> /usr/lib/libf77blas.so.3gf@
>
> so these are there and linked OK and there is no Rlapack.
These are soft links. Could you do an 'l
On 2010-10-15, at 4:39 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 15/10/2010 4:53 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
>> It appears that Mingw gcc included in RTools is missing a dependent
>> library. If I compile a program with '-lgomp' switch (for OpenMP
>> support), I get a error
It appears that Mingw gcc included in RTools is missing a dependent
library. If I compile a program with '-lgomp' switch (for OpenMP
support), I get a errors about undefined references to functions like
'_imp__pthread_mutex_destroy'. Adding the '-static' switch, I get the
following error:
On August 23, 2010 01:27:24 pm Philippe Grosjean wrote:
> They have to write such a code like this:
>
> if (x < -3) do_something
>
> That way, there is no ambiguity. Don't you think it's important to
> write clear code, including by using spaces where it makes it easier
> to read,... and less amb
On 2010-08-23, at 6:15 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:33 PM, ivo welch wrote:
>> I have found that my students often make the mistake of
>> mixing up comparisons and assignments with negative numbers:
>>
>> if (x<-3) do_something;
>
> If you tell your students not to u
32 matches
Mail list logo
