Ah yes. I should have checked the details more finely. I come from a
programming background in a different language, and had the thought that
generic functions would work much like function overloading.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/S4-Method-Signatures-tp2525018
Ah, nevermind. I realised you could have function(...) as the function
signature in the setGeneric call.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/S4-Method-Signatures-tp2525018p2525216.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
