I meant ncol(y) of course.
Brett Presnell writes:
> I suppose that this never affects anything, but in line 57 of lm.R,
> where the coefficients are defined for an empty model, when y is a
> matrix, shouldn't the value be matrix(,0,nrow(y)) rather than
I suppose that this never affects anything, but in line 57 of lm.R,
where the coefficients are defined for an empty model, when y is a
matrix, shouldn't the value be matrix(,0,nrow(y)) rather than
matrix(,0,3)?
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
htt
Regardless of the page's other merits (looks nice to me), I did enjoy
seeing my favorite teacher's (Dev Basu's) elephant in the Bayesian box.
Thanks for that.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
William Dunlap writes:
> Put the formula first in the argument list or label
> the data argument data= and put the formula after it
> if you want to use the formula method for ftable.
Ack! So it was a question for R-help after all. Thanks Bill,
especially for being so polite about it.
__
I apologize in advance if this is the wrong forum for this
report/request, and for the fact that I have not read the code for
ftable.formula in any detail.
>From reading the documentation for ftable.formula, I expected that the
following two calls to ftable would produce the same results:
data(U
s of how it's called.
Peter Ehlers writes:
> On 2011-05-11 07:30, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>> On May 11, 2011, at 15:10 , Brett Presnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this Peter. I'll have to install the development
>>> version to tr
nge multiplier test). In light
of this, I think that it would be much better to use test = "score"
rather than test = "Rao".
--
Brett Presnell
Department of Statistics
University of Florida
http://www.stat.ufl.edu/~presnell/
"We don't think that the popularity
Thanks for putting in the rstandard() change Peter. I'll keep my
fingers crossed that it doesn't break anything.
Meanwhile, I hope that you and all the core developers will take my
enormous appreciation for all that you do as implicit in any message
that I send. You have changed and continue to
>> saturated model: Sometimes it makes sense and sometimes not.)
>>
>>>
>>> John Maindonald email: john.maindon...@anu.edu.au
>>> phone : +61 2 (6125)3473fax : +61 2(6125)5549
>>> Centre for Mathematics & Its Applications, Roo
Thanks Peter. I have just a couple of minor comments, and another
possible feature request, although it's one that I don't think will be
implemented.
peter dalgaard writes:
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 22:25 , Brett Presnell wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there any reason that
My apologies. I guess it would help if I tried the code more than once
before posting. That should have been:
rstandard.glm <-
function(model,
infl=influence(model, do.coef=FALSE),
type=c("deviance", "pearson"), ...)
{
type <- match.arg(type)
res <- switch(type, pear
Is there any reason that rstandard.glm doesn't have a "pearson" option?
And if not, can it be added?
Background: I'm currently teaching an undergrad/grad-service course from
Agresti's "Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (2nd edn)" and
deviance residuals are not used in the text. For now I
be
it should be stated somewhere early in the document that DLL may be
used to refer to both Windows DLLs and Unix shared object libraries.
Of course, some might prefer to have things the other way around:
isn't "shared library" more generic than "DLL"?
--
Brett Presnell
Somehow I managed to copy an older version of my edits before running
"svn diff", so please ignore my last message. I will fix this and
resubmit. Sorry for the bother.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
d object libraries.
Of course, some of us might prefer to have things the other way
around: isn't "shared library" more generic than "DLL"?
---
Brett Presnell
Department of Statistics
University of Florida
http://www.stat.ufl.edu/~presnell/
"We don't thi
15 matches
Mail list logo
