Re: [Rd] serialization regression in 2.15.0 beta

2012-03-28 Thread Ben Goodrich
Quoting Prof Brian Ripley : On 27/03/2012 22:01, Ben Goodrich wrote: In case anyone is concerned that this regression will affect them, the code was reverted to the 2.14.x behavior by r58842 | ripley | 2012-03-26 08:12

Re: [Rd] serialization regression in 2.15.0 beta

2012-03-27 Thread Ben Goodrich
In case anyone is concerned that this regression will affect them, the code was reverted to the 2.14.x behavior by r58842 | ripley | 2012-03-26 08:12:43 -0400 (Mon, 26 Mar 2012) | 1 line Changed paths: M /branches/R-2-15-b

[Rd] serialization regression in 2.15.0 beta

2012-03-25 Thread Ben Goodrich
Hi, I am experiencing a problem related to serialization behavior in 2.15.0 beta (binary installed from Debian unstable) and 2.16.0 (from svn) that is not present in 2.14.2 (binary from Debian testing). I don't fully understand the problem. Also, I tried but have not yet been able to crea

Re: [Rd] License status of CRAN packages

2009-04-24 Thread Ben Goodrich
two different repositories for GPL like > licensed pkg and other packages. > > Christophe > > Le 24 avr. 09 à 18:20, Gabor Grothendieck a écrit : > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Ben Goodrich >> wrote: >>> Kurt Hornik wrote: >>>> AG

Re: [Rd] License status of CRAN packages

2009-04-24 Thread Ben Goodrich
Kurt Hornik wrote: > AGPL, unfortunately, allows supplements, and hence cannot fully be > standardized. We've been thinking about extending the current scheme to > indicate a base license plus supplements, but this is still work in > progress. This would be helpful. I would just reemphasize that

Re: [Rd] License status of CRAN packages

2009-04-23 Thread Ben Goodrich
Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ben Goodrich > wrote: >> Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes: >>> As a non-exhautive list with possible misclassifications, cran2deb currently >>> has these packasges as 'maybe not free'

Re: [Rd] License status of CRAN packages

2009-04-23 Thread Ben Goodrich
Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes: > As a non-exhautive list with possible misclassifications, cran2deb currently > has these packasges as 'maybe not free' and does not build them: > > BARD,BayesDA,CoCo,ConvCalendar,FAiR,PTAk,RScaLAPACK,Rcsdp,SDDA,SGP, > alphahull,ash,asypow,caMassCl

Re: [Rd] [wishlist, patch] Removing .bzr/ directory when calling R CMD build (PR#10625)

2008-01-23 Thread Ben Goodrich
Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > If you place an .Rbuildignore file in the top level of > your package with this line single line as its contents: > > [.]bzr$ > > then the .bzr file will not be included. Thank you for the suggestion. In order to remove both the .bzr/ directory and the .bzrignore file