I have two related packages that are already submitted to CRAN but are
awaiting approval. They are part of the R Documentation Task Force efforts
to improve documentation. The exact function you are referring to I have
called `catch_condition()` and included it in my `testextra` package. You
mig
The README states clearly that a package is orphaned under any of three
conditions:
1. The Maintainer requests is.
2. The maintainer email bounces
3. The maintainer is unresponsive to requests regarding the package from
CRAN maintainers
But I think that it is a good idea to include th
guaranteed to be included in R Core. My apologies to any who may have
misinterpreted the intentions of the announcement.
Sincerely,
Andrew Redd
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:46 PM Andrew Redd wrote:
> cross-posting announcement to R-Announce, R-devel and R-package-devel.
>
> The R Consortium
, skills or expertise as it relates to R
documentation. Also email if you have ideas or concerns but do not wish
to play and active role.
Thank you,
Andrew Redd
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
I am developing a package that is only applicable on windows, is there a
line I can put in the depends field of the DESCRIPTION file to tell that
this should only be build for windows?
Are there any other protocols that I should follow?
Thanks,
--
Andrew
May the Open Source be with you.
I go back and forth between windows and linux, and find myself running
into problem with line endings. Is there a way to control the line
ending conversion when writing files, such as write and cat? More
explicitly I want to be able to write files with LF line endings
rather than CRLF line ending
pty environment will never be collected this
will only run on exit.
-Andrew
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Charles C. Berry wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Andrew Redd wrote:
>
>> so should I use reg.finalizer or overwrite .Last()?
>
>> .Last
>
> Error: object '.Last'
don't overwrite .Last if if has
another purpose.
-Andrew
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Charles C. Berry wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Andrew Redd wrote:
>
>> Just found in the documentation for getHook that packages are not
>> unloaded on quit. How should I force a pa
Just found in the documentation for getHook that packages are not
unloaded on quit. How should I force a package to unload on quit?
-Andrew
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Redd wrote:
> Are packages unloaded on quit so that the .Last.lib or .onUnload are
> called for pa
Are packages unloaded on quit so that the .Last.lib or .onUnload are
called for packages?
-Andrew
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Andrew Redd wrote:
> Perhaps you could help me make some sense of this. Here is a printout
> of my sessions.
> ---
> toys$R -q
>> library(test
the code should be unloaded. But it appears that it is not from
errors when I explicitly unload the test2.so it does not through a
segfault. Why would this be happening? and how do I circumvent it.
thanks,
Andrew
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010
useDynLib.
Thanks,
Andrew Redd
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
testgpu.log but do not show anything interesting.
Can anyone give any insight?
Thanks,
Andrew Redd
Links to files:
http://andrewredd.us/gputest/testgpu.R
http://andrewredd.us/gputest/testgpu.Rout
http://andrewredd.us/gputest/gputest_1.0.tar.gz
http://andrewredd.us/gputest/testgpu.log
___
Is there a way that I can change the prompt for within a browser() call. I
often use use code like
> with(obj1,browser())
Browse[1]>
Is there a way that I can set it so that I can get something like
> with(obj1,browser(prompt="obj1"))
obj1[1]>
I know that prompt is not a valid option for brows
I'm developing some software and running into compiling warning:
conditionals.c:104: warning: passing argument 4 of 'dger_' discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
conditionals.c:104: warning: passing argument 6 of 'dger_' discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
the netlib documentation
I'm having problems with an access violation error on some compiled code
that I'm writing and I was hoping that some one had insights as to what
might be causing the access violation and possibly how to remedy it.
Here's the situation. The compiled code performs an EM algorithm on the
data for gi
s would already be included in the base.
Is there a reason that it is not? I did a search through the archives
but did not turn up anything relevant.
Thanks,
Andrew Redd
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
17 matches
Mail list logo