being described as something "my package calls", but I
don't mean that.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Enhence: foo4
>
> No, you only need foo1 and foo2. The other two are optional.
Unless you want to CHECK the package. In that case, you'll need
Suggests, too.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
large hump of work to be
done before you move to the new version, but you could give yourself
permission to rev it every.. what; year? Two?
ggplot2012? :)
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
"
and
extdepstring2depstring(src,systype="unknown")
yields the default.
I think this would be preferable to a growing taxonomy of
Depends-[system]:
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Greetings, and apologies for the braino leading to my first posting to
the general list. I'm reposting here, and changing how I attached the
files; they were hard to work with in the other post.
There's a coalescing group which is working to imitate Dirk's fine
translation of CRAN to APT, in
e borders connecting R to [distribution in question] can
easily repackage R software, then the utility of R to the world will
increase. I think this would be a good thing.
I understand that it's not a big priority for that fraction of R-devel
who lives amongst their garde
ncy graph'.
4) Install all the packages in the broad dependency graph.
5) for each package in the broad graph, run CHECK with
R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS=true.
Then the affected packages are "checked". Perhaps this can be noted
with a signature.
Whew!
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
nuisance.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
ility available from it. But I've got a
reputation as an overengineer, so..
In any case, I agree that the earlier check doesn't add anything
except possible satisfaction by the binary-package maintainers.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-proje
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:53 , Allen S. Rout wrote:
>
>> I'm working to automate the building of RPM packages for CRAN &c.
>> In the process, I'm trying to get a sense of the correct
>> dependencies.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> In other words,
es. :) ggplot2,
which was the initial itch I was trying to scratch, 'Depends' only on
R. But if I have to recursively expand according to these 'build
requires', I need 63 packages. And more painfully, I have to leave
CRAN and go grok Bioconductor. Yow.
So: does this seem s
like it that
way. :)
It seemed like a doc clarification was in order, whichever way it went.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
to be
> concatenation is a reasonably widespread convention.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
y.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/iff
http://webster.com/dictionary/iff
I'd figure if we can use it in Scrabble(tm), we can use it in
technical documentation.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
esponsibility to distribute
it yourself.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
instring, systype = "", debug=FALSE)
and some tests. It's my first attempt at an R package, and it passed
check on my box, so please be gentle if I've done dumb stuff.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
r formatting to a few authors, (i.e. the
packages I happen to use right now) but I wonder if there is any
central philosophical opinion on how that field ought to look? If the
Gods of R think that automated parsing of SystemRequirements is
unimportant, I'll have to maintain them by han
that meets the definition of "not well recieved" ;)
Thanks for your time.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
one other package-heirarchy maintainer who might like this, and
subsuming it in the base function would be nice.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:03:29 -0400, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think there are mixed feelings about whether it is a feature or a
> misfeature, but it's a very old property of the S language.
Oh well, understoo
a, dat, data, etc... sounds miserable to me.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
le/stable/deprecated sort of cycle
already conventional? This might be a Fine Manual question, but the
Writing R Extensions doc doesn't mention it.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
22 matches
Mail list logo
