duplicate function with
*deep==FALSE,* which does not sound correct to me if we don't do a deep
copy of the SEXP.
Best,
Jiefei
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:07 PM Gabriel Becker
wrote:
> Jiefei,
>
> Inline.
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:30 PM 介非王 wrote:
>
>> Hello Luke and
Hi,
Sorry for overflow the mailbox. Please ignore the second question, I
misunderstand Gabriel answer.
Best,
Jiefei
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:29 PM 介非王 wrote:
> Hello Luke and Gabriel,
>
> Thank you very much for your quick responses. The explanation of STDVEC is
> very h
That said I don't think either of these are bugs, per se, but rather a
> misunderstanding of the API. Details inline.
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:57 AM 介非王 wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have encountered two bugs when using ALTREP APIs.
>>
>>
Hello,
I have encountered two bugs when using ALTREP APIs.
1. STDVEC_DATAPTR
>From RInternal.h file it has a comment:
/* ALTREP support */
> void *(STDVEC_DATAPTR)(SEXP x);
However, this comment might not be true, the easiest way to verify it is to
define a C++ function:
void C_testFunc(SEX
Thank you very much for your explanation! I'm looking forward to seeing the
changes of R functions in a furture release.
Best,
Jiefei
Tierney, Luke 于2019年5月10日周五 下午12:22写道:
> On Fri, 10 May 2019, 介非王 wrote:
>
> > Hi Gabriel,
> >
> > Thanks for your explanation, I
isn't read only) then you're basically stepping out of ALTREP space
> anyway, so it makes sense that a normally laid-out STRSXP (with it's
> CHARSXP payload).
>
> Best,
> ~G
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:09 AM 介非王 wrote:
>
>> Hello from Bioconducto
Hello from Bioconductor,
I'm developing a package to share R objects across clusters using boost
library. The concept is similar to mmap package:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mmap/index.html . However, I have a
problem when I was trying to write Dataptr_method for the alternative
string