Terry,
If I understand you, this is a problem anytime you include more than one
function with the same name and the latest masks all others. It is not only
a problem with the tidyverse, albeit that is an example of bringing in quite
a few functions from many packages at once.
I wonder if the foll
Hello.
I just (re-)discovered that structure(sum, init = 100) is "sticky",
i.e. it stays with base::sum(). Here's an minimal example:
$ R --vanilla --quiet
> void <- structure(sum, some_attr = TRUE)
> str(sum)
function (..., na.rm = FALSE)
- attr(*, "some_attr")= logi TRUE
>From my very basic t
In response to the tidyverse habit of adding another zillion functions to one's
search space, the use of things like survival::coxph is becoming more common.
But this practice breaks the use of the specials argument in terms.formula,
something that I make heavy use of in the survival package.
Dear All,
The next R Dev Day will be the day after useR! 2025, at Duke University,
Durham, NC, USA on Monday 11 August.
Read more details and apply for a place:
https://user2025.r-project.org/additional/r-dev-day
*Deadline: Tuesday, 15 April (midnight anywhere on earth).*
The latest informati
