On 2025-03-02 1:09 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
I, like Duncan, am just following along here. I think there might be
two distinct questions which it would be useful to keep distinct:
* how to silence the rust-check if desired?
rather than debating whether the rust-check should be always-on
Mossa,
> On Mar 2, 2025, at 11:45 PM, Mossa Merhi Reimert wrote:
>
> There has been very little engagement with the issue I referred to. If it was
> decided that this “check” ought to be part of the default checks for R, then
> that could have been written to us. Either on the bugs.r-project.
I, like Duncan, am just following along here. I think there might be
two distinct questions which it would be useful to keep distinct:
* how to silence the rust-check if desired?
rather than debating whether the rust-check should be always-on,
on-for-CRAN-only, etc., would it provide for u
On 2025-03-02 11:03 a.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
Well this has surely veered off course!
As the one who filed the BugZilla report, I'd like to redirect the
conversation and provide further context.
The question should be /"how do we get a dialogue started on this
bugzilla issue before the next
Well this has surely veered off course!
As the one who filed the BugZilla report, I'd like to redirect the
conversation and provide further context.
The question should be *"how do we get a dialogue started on this bugzilla
issue before the next minor *
*release of R?"*
The current check for Rus
> I've looked for other messages on this, and didn't see any besides this
> one explaining why including check_rust() in the checks is a problem.
I agree with you. It seems no one explained what problem it causes to them.
In my understanding (disclaimer: I haven't hit this by myself yet), the
prob
You seem to be taking a confontational tone, which isn't likely to
encourage a reasonable dialogue.
I've looked for other messages on this, and didn't see any besides this
one explaining why including check_rust() in the checks is a problem.
The problem you talk about here is that it encourage
Dear Simon Urbanek,
There has been very little engagement with the issue I referred to. If it was
decided that this “check” ought to be part of the default checks for R,
then that could have been written to us. Either on the bugs.r-project.org or
the proposed patch. Before we talk about anything
