That should do it
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 30, 2024, at 9:57 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Many thanks both. I'll wait for Luke's confirmation to trigger the update with
the backported fix.
Iñaki
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 12:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel
mailto:e...@debian.org>> wrote:
On 30 April 2024 at
Many thanks both. I'll wait for Luke's confirmation to trigger the update
with the backported fix.
Iñaki
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 12:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 30 April 2024 at 11:59, peter dalgaard wrote:
> | svn diff -c 86235 ~/r-devel/R
>
> Which is also available as
>
> https://githu
On 30 April 2024 at 11:59, peter dalgaard wrote:
| svn diff -c 86235 ~/r-devel/R
Which is also available as
https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/f7c46500f455eb4edfc3656c3fa20af61b16abb7
Dirk
| (or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily backported.
|
| (CC Luke in cas
svn diff -c 86235 ~/r-devel/R
(or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily backported.
(CC Luke in case there is more to it)
- pd
> On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> Dear R-core,
>
> I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We
Dear R-core,
I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We
updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem
there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if
there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me t
