Everyone, take a deep breath - there have been many disruptions in last few
days - some obvious, others associated with the R release and the BioC
disruptions on CRAN, so there is no need to panic and start devising
"solutions" for issues that are temporary. Things are being sorted out and some
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:15:47 +0200
Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> That's not how this worked in the past AFAIR. Simply, the packages in
> the x.y.z/Recommended directories were included in
> src/contrib/PACKAGES*, metadata, with the correct R version
> dependencies, in the correct order, so that `install.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:06 PM Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:32:59 +0200
> Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> > Finally, I'd think it definitely would be nice for
> > install.packages("Matrix") to automatically get the correct
> > Matrix version from CRAN ... so we (R-core) would be grat
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:32:59 +0200
Martin Maechler wrote:
> Finally, I'd think it definitely would be nice for
> install.packages("Matrix") to automatically get the correct
> Matrix version from CRAN ... so we (R-core) would be grateful
> for a patch to install.packages() to achieve this
Since t
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, at 11:32 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Gábor Csárdi
>> on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:55:36 +0200 writes:
>
> > I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
> > 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
>
> Yes, it *is* available from CRAN: You can see it when
> Gábor Csárdi
> on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:55:36 +0200 writes:
> I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
> 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
Yes, it *is* available from CRAN: You can see it when looking into the
4.4.0/ , specifically the
4.4.0/Recomm
I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
However, currently CRAN has
Package: Matrix
Version: 1.6-5
Priority: recommended
Depends: R (>= 3.5.0), methods
...
(plus another version for R >= 4.5.0 only).
Which has some weird consequences, e.g. if I
