On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:35:42 -0400
Ben Bolker wrote:
> I'm using bleeding-edge R-devel, so maybe my build is weird. Can
> anyone else reproduce this?
>
>View() seems to crash on just about anything.
Not for me, sorry.
If you have a sufficiently new processor, you can use `rr` [*] to
capt
> Hervé Pagès writes:
> Hi Kurt,
> Is it intended that numeric_version() returns an error by default on
> non-character input in R 4.4.0?
Dear Herve, yes, that's the intention.
> It seems that I can turn this into a warning by setting
> _R_CHECK_STOP_ON_INVALID_NUMERIC_VERSION_INPUTS_=false
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, Hadley Wickham wrote:
A few more thoughts based on a simple question: how do you determine the
length of a vector?
Rf_length() is used in example code in R-exts, but I don't think it's
formally documented anywhere (although it's possible I missed it). Is using
in an example
As suggested by Josh Ulrich, here's what I get when running under
valgrind.
$ R -d valgrind
==218120== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==218120== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==218120== Using Valgrind-3.18.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright
info
==2
I'm using bleeding-edge R-devel, so maybe my build is weird. Can
anyone else reproduce this?
View() seems to crash on just about anything.
View(1:3)
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Aborted (core dumped)
If I debug(View) I get to the last line of code with nothing
obviously l
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:32 PM luke-tierney--- via R-devel
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > That is not true at all - the presence of header does not constitute
> declaration of something as the R API. There are cases where internal
> functi
Hi Kurt,
Is it intended that numeric_version() returns an error by default on
non-character input in R 4.4.0? It seems that I can turn this into a
warning by setting
_R_CHECK_STOP_ON_INVALID_NUMERIC_VERSION_INPUTS_=false but I don't seem
to be able to find any of this mentioned in the NEWS fil
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, Hadley Wickham wrote:
That is not true at all - the presence of header does not constitute
declaration of something as the R API. There are cases where internal
functions are in the headers for historical or other reasons since the
headers are used both for the internal
> On Apr 25, 2024, at 12:55 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
>
>
> >>> That is not true at all - the presence of header does not constitute
> >> declaration of something as the R API. There are cases where internal
> >> functions are in the headers for historical or other reasons since the
> >> h
A few more thoughts based on a simple question: how do you determine the
length of a vector?
Rf_length() is used in example code in R-exts, but I don't think it's
formally documented anywhere (although it's possible I missed it). Is using
in an example sufficient to consider a function to be part
> And in general, I'd urge R Core to make an explicit list of functions that
you consider to be part of the exported API
While I believe R Core is in the process of such clarification, I'd also
vote for this. Now that WRE has "experimental" category, and if we take the
current definition of "docum
>
>
>
> >>> That is not true at all - the presence of header does not constitute
> >> declaration of something as the R API. There are cases where internal
> >> functions are in the headers for historical or other reasons since the
> >> headers are used both for the internal implementation and pack
12 matches
Mail list logo
