> On 7/02/2024, at 5:06 AM, Prof Brian Ripley via R-devel
> wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2024 19:41, Holger Hoefling wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I wanted to ask if people have good advice on how to debug M1Mac package
>> check errors when you don´t have a Mac? Is a cloud machine the best option
>> or is there so
I went looking and found this in codetools, where it's been for 20 years
https://gitlab.com/luke-tierney/codetools/-/blame/master/R/codetools.R?ref_type=heads#L951
I think the call stack in codetools is checkUsagePackage -> checkUsageEnv ->
checkUsage, and these are similarly established. The ca
The SO post https://stackoverflow.com/q/77943180 tried to call
globalCallingHandlers() from a function, and it failed with the error
message "should not be called with handlers on the stack". A much
simpler illustration of the same error comes from this line:
try(globalCallingHandlers(warni
Here's a dummy example that I think illustrates the problem:
toto <- function() {
if (runif(1) < 0.5)
function(a) a
else
function(a,b) a+b
}
> fcn <- toto()
> fcn(1,2)
[1] 3
> fcn <- toto()
> fcn(1,2)
[1] 3
> fcn <- toto()
> fcn(1,2)
Error in fcn(1, 2) : unused argument (2)
How can y
On 06/02/2024 2:17 p.m., Hervé Pagès wrote:
Thanks. Workarounds are interesting but... what's the point of the NOTE
in the first place?
Creating a function that can't be called could be an error. Presumably
you are careful and never try to call it with the wrong signature, but
the check code
Because functions get called and therefore, the calling sequence matters. It’s
just protecting you from yourself, but as someone pointed out, there’s a way to
silence such notes.
G
From: Hervé Pagès
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:40 PM
To: Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E] ; Duncan Murdoch
;
The note refers to the fact that the function named ‘fun’ appears to be defined
in two different ways.
From: Hervé Pagès
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:17 PM
To: Duncan Murdoch ; Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E]
; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Rd] NOTE: multiple local function
Thanks. Workarounds are interesting but... what's the point of the NOTE
in the first place?
H.
On 2/4/24 09:07, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 04/02/2024 10:55 a.m., Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E] via R-devel
> wrote:
>> Well you can see that yeast is exactly weekday you have. The way out
>> is t
M1mac numerical issues should be rare, but when they do pop up they can be
disconcerting.
The following little script reveals what happens with no extended precision. A
few months
ago I built this into a "package" and used
https://mac.r-project.org/macbuilder/submit.html
to run it, getting the
On 04/02/2024 19:41, Holger Hoefling wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to ask if people have good advice on how to debug M1Mac package
check errors when you don´t have a Mac? Is a cloud machine the best option
or is there something else?
I presumed this was about a CRAN package, possibly hdf5r which has a
I just saw this
r85704 | hornik | 2023-12-19 00:33:07 -0600 (Tue, 19 Dec 2023) | 1 line
Changed paths:
M /trunk/doc/NEWS.Rd
M /trunk/src/library/base/R/matrix.R
M /trunk/src/library/base/man/nrow.Rd
M /trunk/src/li
11 matches
Mail list logo
