Does mFUN() really need to be a function of x and the NA values of x? I
can't think of a case where it would be used on anything but the non-NA
values of x.
I think it would be easier to specify a different mFUN() (and document this
new argument) if the function has one argument and is applied to
Le 18/12/2023 à 11:24, Martin Maechler a écrit :
Serguei Sokol via R-devel
on Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:29:02 +0100 writes:
> Le 17/12/2023 à 18:26, Barry Rowlingson a écrit :
>> I think what's been missed is that zapsmall works relative to the
absolute
>> largest value in the vec
> Serguei Sokol via R-devel
> on Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:29:02 +0100 writes:
> Le 17/12/2023 à 18:26, Barry Rowlingson a écrit :
>> I think what's been missed is that zapsmall works relative to the
absolute
>> largest value in the vector. Hence if there's only one
>> item
Le 17/12/2023 à 18:26, Barry Rowlingson a écrit :
I think what's been missed is that zapsmall works relative to the absolute
largest value in the vector. Hence if there's only one
item in the vector, it is the largest, so its not zapped. The function's
raison d'etre isn't to replace absolutely sm
