Re: [Rd] Request: documenting more specifically language objects in the R Language Definition document

Thank you for your answers. Just let me disagree slightly with Tomas view. On 13/12/2023 12:05, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > On 12/13/23 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> I doubt if anyone will take you up on this request.  Only R Core >> members can change those manuals, and it's hard work to write cl

Re: [Rd] Request: documenting more specifically language objects in the R Language Definition document

On 12/13/23 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote: I doubt if anyone will take you up on this request.  Only R Core members can change those manuals, and it's hard work to write clear and correct documentation.  This probably won't make it high enough on their lists of priorities to actually be addressed

Re: [Rd] Request: documenting more specifically language objects in the R Language Definition document

I doubt if anyone will take you up on this request. Only R Core members can change those manuals, and it's hard work to write clear and correct documentation. This probably won't make it high enough on their lists of priorities to actually be addressed. What you could do is try to write it y

[Rd] Request: documenting more specifically language objects in the R Language Definition document

Dear all, This is a request to get language objects more documented in the R Language Definition document (CRAN version, ETHZ R-devel version). Section '2.1.3 Language

Re: [Rd] Partial matching performance in data frame rownames using [

Dear Ivan, thanks a lot, that is helpful. Still, I feel that default partial matching cripples the functionality of data.frame for larger tables. Thanks again and best regards Hilmar On 12.12.23 13:55, Ivan Krylov wrote: В Mon, 11 Dec 2023 21:11:48 +0100 Hilmar Berger via R-devel пишет: W