Le 25/04/2023 à 17:39, Bill Dunlap a écrit :
x <- c(1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3)
y <- c(1, 2, 1, 3, NA, 3)
str(xyTable(x,y))
List of 3
$ x : num [1:6] 1 1 2 2 NA 3
$ y : num [1:6] 1 2 1 3 NA 3
$ number: int [1:6] 1 1 1 NA NA 1
How many (2,3)s do we have? At least one, the third entry, bu
x <- c(1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3)
y <- c(1, 2, 1, 3, NA, 3)
> str(xyTable(x,y))
List of 3
$ x : num [1:6] 1 1 2 2 NA 3
$ y : num [1:6] 1 2 1 3 NA 3
$ number: int [1:6] 1 1 1 NA NA 1
How many (2,3)s do we have? At least one, the third entry, but the fourth
entry, (2,NA), is possibly a (2,3) so
Nice! Would this be something to consider as either a permanent fix to
xyTable() (to me, the function is right now behaving in a rather unexpected
manner, if not to say, buggy) or via an argument (for backwards compatability)?
Best,
Wolfgang
>-Original Message-
>From: Serguei Sokol [mai
I correct myself. Obviously, the line
first[is.na(first) | isFALSE(first)] <- FALSE
should read
first[is.na(first)] <- FALSE
Serguei.
Le 25/04/2023 à 11:30, Serguei Sokol a écrit :
Le 25/04/2023 à 10:24, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP) a écrit :
Hi all,
Posted this many years ago
(https://stat
Le 25/04/2023 à 10:24, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP) a écrit :
Hi all,
Posted this many years ago
(https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-December/075224.html), but either
this slipped under the radar or my feeble mind is unable to understand what
xyTable() is doing here and nobody bothered
Hi all,
Posted this many years ago
(https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-December/075224.html), but either
this slipped under the radar or my feeble mind is unable to understand what
xyTable() is doing here and nobody bothered to correct me. I now stumbled again
across this issue.
x <-
