Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/01/2023 4:07 p.m., Sebastian Meyer wrote: Am 10.01.23 um 21:28 schrieb Duncan Murdoch: On 10/01/2023 2:05 p.m., Ivan Krylov wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 + RICHET Yann wrote: In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned.

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Meyer
Am 10.01.23 um 21:28 schrieb Duncan Murdoch: On 10/01/2023 2:05 p.m., Ivan Krylov wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 + RICHET Yann wrote: In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. I think you're right about your tests de-facto us

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/01/2023 2:05 p.m., Ivan Krylov wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 + RICHET Yann wrote: In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. I think you're right about your tests de-facto using two threads, but it might be a good idea t

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:27:53 + RICHET Yann wrote: > In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which > backs to two threads as warned. I think you're right about your tests de-facto using two threads, but it might be a good idea to _default_ to up to two threads in tests a

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Serguei Sokol via R-devel
Looks like there is a kind of misunderstanding... Le 10/01/2023 à 17:27, RICHET Yann a écrit : > Thank you for your answer. > In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to > two threads as warned. But I cannot imagine this costs so much time just for > that... Exces

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread RICHET Yann
Thank you for your answer. In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. But I cannot imagine this costs so much time just for that... A deeper analysis of time spent seems to point that a large time was mainly spent on testthat and Rcpp depen

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Serguei Sokol via R-devel
Le 10/01/2023 à 11:37, Serguei Sokol a écrit : Le 10/01/2023 à 10:44, RICHET Yann a écrit : Dear R-devel people, We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we

Re: [Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread Serguei Sokol via R-devel
Le 10/01/2023 à 10:44, RICHET Yann a écrit : Dear R-devel people, We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so the

Re: [Rd] Shouldn't "Loading" be "Attaching" when referring to library() calls?

2023-01-10 Thread Martin Maechler
> Martin Maechler > on Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:26:53 +0100 writes: > Michael Chirico via R-devel > on Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:25:46 -0800 writes: >> require() and library() both emit this message immediately before >> running library(): >> "Loading required package:

[Rd] rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack

2023-01-10 Thread RICHET Yann
Dear R-devel people, We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so there is a huge layer of cmake & scripting to make

Re: [Rd] Shouldn't "Loading" be "Attaching" when referring to library() calls?

2023-01-10 Thread Martin Maechler
> Michael Chirico via R-devel > on Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:25:46 -0800 writes: > require() and library() both emit this message immediately before > running library(): > "Loading required package: %s" > https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/4198a2941b702d965bb2374c2b908f