Here is the code again in text:
src <- rectGrob(2/3, 1/3, width=.6, height=.6, gp=gpar(lwd = 5,
fill=rgb(0, 0, 0.9, 0.4)))
dst <- rectGrob(1/3, 2/3, width=.6, height=.6, gp=gpar(lwd = 5,
fill=rgb(0.7, 0, 0, 0.8)))
svg("cairo.in.svg", width = 5, height = 5)
grid.group(src, "in", dst)
dev.off(
On 9/27/22 18:42, Blätte, Andreas wrote:
Dear all,
my apologies for a dull question. I think I do understand that unnoticed
Internet access requires scrutiny and a more explicit approach.
But I am not sure how this would impact on the practice on many Windows
machines to download static libra
El mar., 27 sept. 2022 18:42, Blätte, Andreas
escribió:
> Dear all,
>
> my apologies for a dull question. I think I do understand that unnoticed
> Internet access requires scrutiny and a more explicit approach.
>
> But I am not sure how this would impact on the practice on many Windows
> machines
Dear all,
my apologies for a dull question. I think I do understand that unnoticed
Internet access requires scrutiny and a more explicit approach.
But I am not sure how this would impact on the practice on many Windows
machines to download static libraries from one of the rwinlib repositories?
Hi, sure
I attach the test code and my svg.
You can also find my current work on ggiraph in the branch ge15 on github:
https://github.com/sigmapi/ggiraph/tree/ge15
Thanks,
Panagiotis
On 27/9/22 04:44, Paul Murrell wrote:
Could you also please send me the SVG code that your device is
ge
El mar., 27 sept. 2022 4:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel escribió:
>
> Regarding 'system' libraries: Packages like stringi and nloptr download the
> source of, respectively, libicu or libnlopt and build a library _if_ the
> library is not found locally. If we outlaw this, more users may hit a
> brick
> wa
