Re: [Rd] Feature request – math in HTML help

2021-05-27 Thread Simon Urbanek
Just to clarify the confusion, let me rephrase that. I see this as a request to add support for converting \eqn{} and friends to MathJax in R html documentation (both in core packages as well as all contributed packages). That sounds like a reasonable request to me, but I would not volunteer t

Re: [Rd] Feature request – math in HTML help

2021-05-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 27/05/2021 4:54 p.m., Jan Netík wrote: I am so sorry, my post sounded quite the opposite of what I intended! I used the term "monkey patch" as a technical one (see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patch ) and I said "weird" meaning mathjax

Re: [Rd] Feature request – math in HTML help

2021-05-27 Thread Jan Netík
I am so sorry, my post sounded quite the opposite of what I intended! I used the term "monkey patch" as a technical one (see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patch) and I said "weird" meaning mathjaxr is something fulfilling the concept, but only figuratively. Actually I gave mathjaxr as a g

Re: [Rd] Feature request – math in HTML help

2021-05-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 27/05/2021 2:34 p.m., Jan Netík wrote: Hi all, long I have been thinking about proper rendering of math in the HTML form of R documentation. As you know, you can write \eqn{} in your .Rd files and this is nicely rendered into the PDF Reference manual of the package with the aid of TeX. Howeve

[Rd] Feature request – math in HTML help

2021-05-27 Thread Jan Netík
Hi all, long I have been thinking about proper rendering of math in the HTML form of R documentation. As you know, you can write \eqn{} in your .Rd files and this is nicely rendered into the PDF Reference manual of the package with the aid of TeX. However, that is not the case in the aforementione