On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 14:19, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
>
> Am 21.01.21 um 13:51 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
> > Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version
> > bump?
>
> Yes. The NEWS mention the pipe syntax for R-devel not for R-patched.
>
> See the section "CHANGES IN R 4.0.3 pat
Am 21.01.21 um 13:51 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
> Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version
> bump?
Yes. The NEWS mention the pipe syntax for R-devel not for R-patched.
See the section "CHANGES IN R 4.0.3 patched" in
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html
On 21/01/2021 7:51 a.m., Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version
bump?
I don't think I've seen anything to signal that it will end up in 4.0.4.
It's intended for 4.1.0, as far as all the signs show.
Duncan Murdoch
A package planning to drop
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version
bump? A package planning to drop magrittr would end up depending on R
4.0.4, which sounds suboptimal. And (I don't find any reference to
this in the manual or in CRAN policies, but) if I remember correctly,
depending on a patch v
Full schedule is available on https://developer.r-project.org (or
https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/index.html for the impatient).
--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Office: A
