> Hmm, really? In `R Under development (unstable) (2020-08-14
> r79020)`, doing the indexed assignment with a regular matrix (as opposed
> to a Matrix) appears to preserve attributes.
I was referring to *Matrix* objects.
Sorry, if that wasn't clear.
__
Thanks for taking a look!
Hmm, really? In `R Under development (unstable) (2020-08-14
r79020)`, doing the indexed assignment with a regular matrix (as opposed
to a Matrix) appears to preserve attributes.
m1 <- matrix(1:9,3,3)
attr(m1,"junk") <- 12
stopifnot(isTRUE(attr(m1,"junk")==12))
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:10 PM Tomas Kalibera wrote:
>
> On 8/22/20 8:26 PM, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
> > On 8/22/20 7:58 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:39 AM Tomas Kalibera
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 8/21/20 11:45 PM, m19tdn+9alxwj7d2bmk--- via R-devel wrote:
> Ah yes, this i
On 8/22/20 8:26 PM, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 8/22/20 7:58 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:39 AM Tomas Kalibera
wrote:
On 8/21/20 11:45 PM, m19tdn+9alxwj7d2bmk--- via R-devel wrote:
Ah yes, this is related. I reported v2010 below, but it looks like
I was updated to this Inside
On 8/22/20 7:58 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:39 AM Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 8/21/20 11:45 PM, m19tdn+9alxwj7d2bmk--- via R-devel wrote:
Ah yes, this is related. I reported v2010 below, but it looks like I was
updated to this Insider Build overnight without my knowledge, an
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:39 AM Tomas Kalibera wrote:
>
> On 8/21/20 11:45 PM, m19tdn+9alxwj7d2bmk--- via R-devel wrote:
> > Ah yes, this is related. I reported v2010 below, but it looks like I was
> > updated to this Insider Build overnight without my knowledge, and conflated
> > it with the ne
Hi Ben,
I had some problems reproducing this.
As far as I can tell *all* indexed assignments drop attributes.
(Maybe we have different versions).
I'm not an expert on S4, but I'm unenthusiastic about mixing slot (S4)
semantics with attribute (S3) semantics.
And str() excludes attributes, but attr
