Re: [Rd] New R function is.nana = is.na & !is.nan

2020-01-01 Thread Jan Gorecki
"nana" is meant to express "NA, really NA". Your suggestion sounds good. On Thu 2 Jan, 2020, 3:38 AM Pages, Herve, wrote: > Happy New Year everybody! > > The name (is.nana) doesn't make much sense to me. Can you explain it? > > One alternative would be to add an extra argument (e.g. 'strict') to

Re: [Rd] New R function is.nana = is.na & !is.nan

2020-01-01 Thread Pages, Herve
Happy New Year everybody! The name (is.nana) doesn't make much sense to me. Can you explain it? One alternative would be to add an extra argument (e.g. 'strict') to is.na(). FALSE by default, and ignored (with or w/o a warning) when the type of 'x' is not "numeric". H. On 12/31/19 22:16, Jan