On 26/08/2019 1:58 p.m., William Dunlap wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Scripts are for throwaways, not for anything worth keeping.
I totally agree and have a tangentially relevant question about the <<-
operator. Currently 'name <<- value' means to look up the environment
stack until you fin
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Scripts are for throwaways, not for anything worth keeping.
I totally agree and have a tangentially relevant question about the <<-
operator. Currently 'name <<- value' means to look up the environment
stack until you find 'name' and (a) if you find 'name' in some frame
Right, I did not mean to imply these tests are equivalent. Only that both
similarly exclude execution of main() under some context.
Best,
CG
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On 23/08/2019 4:22 p.m., petr smirnov wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing a warning message when I load a large R object
created in an R 3.6 session in R 3.5.* , as follows:
```
Warning message:
In load(“GDSCv2.RData”) :
cannot unserialize ALTVEC object of class ‘wrap_logical’ from package
‘base’; r
Hi,
I am experiencing a warning message when I load a large R object
created in an R 3.6 session in R 3.5.* , as follows:
```
Warning message:
In load(“GDSCv2.RData”) :
cannot unserialize ALTVEC object of class ‘wrap_logical’ from package
‘base’; returning length zero vector
```
Of relevant info
That is unfortunately wrong, though. Whether the script runs as "main"
and whether R is in interactive mode are independent properties. I
guess most of the time it works, because _usually_ you run the whole
script (main()) in non-interactive mode, and source() it in
interactive mode, but this is no
