Re: [Rd] gfortran 9 quantreg bug

2019-08-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 August 2019 at 10:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | then providing compatibility with what came after. As for Fortran, can't | recall such a change. Come to think about it we had it in Debian once or twice in the 20+ years I contributed but I can't recall anymore when it was either. Dirk --

Re: [Rd] gfortran 9 quantreg bug

2019-08-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Kasper, On 6 August 2019 at 10:33, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: | Thanks for the blog post on this, and the pointers in this email. My pleasure! There wasn't much in there that was "new" but it often helps to just tie it together with a valid and real example (as provided by Roger). | I ha

Re: [Rd] gfortran 9 quantreg bug

2019-08-06 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
Dirk, Thanks for the blog post on this, and the pointers in this email. I have a question: it seems to me that you end up using a different compiler for the package (quantreg) than was used to build R itself. As I understand ABI changes, this is considered unsupported (ok, that depends on what ve

Re: [Rd] [EXTERNAL] Re: Potential bug in update.formula when updating offsets

2019-08-06 Thread Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
Yes, it is almost certainly the same issue.  At useR I promised Martin that I would put together a clear example and fix for him and I have not yet done so.  I will try to do that this week.   The heart of the issue is that in a terms object the offset expression will apear in the 'variable

Re: [Rd] Potential bug in update.formula when updating offsets

2019-08-06 Thread peter dalgaard
Terry, Martin Would this happen to be related to the "indexing term objects" issue that has been bothering you? -pd > On 5 Aug 2019, at 21:44 , Paul Buerkner wrote: > > Hi all, > > update.formula does not seem to correctly update (i.e. remove in my case) > offset terms. > > Here is an examp

[Rd] R CMD check: should .Rout.save contain the new "Registered S3 method overwritten by" message?

2019-08-06 Thread Matthieu S
Hi Since I believe 3.6, there is a message when loading a package that overwrites S3 methods, reading like "Registered S3 method overwritten by...". Should this message be included in the xxx.Rout.save files saved in the tests/ folder of a package? It seems R CMD check is not happy about it? I si

[Rd] Potential bug in update.formula when updating offsets

2019-08-06 Thread Paul Buerkner
Hi all, update.formula does not seem to correctly update (i.e. remove in my case) offset terms. Here is an example: update(~x + offset(z), ~ . - offset(z)) > ~x + offset(z) Also: update(~x, ~ . - offset(z)) > ~x + offset(z) In both cases, I would expect the result > ~x as - should remove