El mié., 8 ago. 2018 a las 19:23, Gabe Becker () escribió:
>
> Actually, I sent that too quickly, I should have let it stew a bit more.
> I've changed my mind about the resolution argument I Was trying to make.
> There is more information, technically speaking, in the factor with empty
> levels. I'
>> So we say that a
>> factor `x` has finer resolution than factor `y` if the levels of `y`
>> are contained in `x`. So to find the common type of two factors, we
>> take the union of the levels of each factor, given a factor that has
>> finer resolution than both.
>
> I'm not so sure. I think a mo
> > I now have a better argument, I think:
>
> > If you squint your brain a little, I think you can see
> > that each set of automatic coercions is about increasing
> > resolution. Integers are low resolution versions of
> > doubles, and dates are low resolution versions of
>
Actually, I sent that too quickly, I should have let it stew a bit more.
I've changed my mind about the resolution argument I Was trying to make.
There is more information, technically speaking, in the factor with empty
levels. I'm still not convinced that its the right behavior, personally. It
may
Hadley,
Responses inline.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:34 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> >>> Method dispatch for `vec_c()` is quite simple because associativity and
> >>> commutativity mean that we can determine the output type only by
> >>> considering a pair of inputs at a time. To this end, vctrs p
> Hadley Wickham
> on Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:34:42 -0500 writes:
Method dispatch for `vec_c()` is quite simple because
associativity and commutativity mean that we can
determine the output type only by considering a pair of
inputs at a time. To this end
>>> Method dispatch for `vec_c()` is quite simple because associativity and
>>> commutativity mean that we can determine the output type only by
>>> considering a pair of inputs at a time. To this end, vctrs provides
>>> `vec_type2()` which takes two inputs and returns their common type
>>> (repres
> Martin Maechler
> on Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:17:50 +0100 writes:
(a bit more than 6 months ago)
> Ramiro Barrantes
> on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:02:52 + writes:
>> Hello, I was relying on withTimeout (from R.utils) to
>> help me stop nlme when it �hangs�. However,
