Emil et al.,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:08 AM, Emil Bode wrote:
> I don't think there's much wrong with is.na(as_date(Inf,
> origin='1970-01-01'))==FALSE, as there still is some "non-NA-ness" about
> the value (as difftime shows), but that the output when printing is
> confusing. The way cat is
Dear all,
I would like to have your opinion about an issue I have recently run into
while using tcltk in R 3.5.0 under Windows 7 64bit.
Here is a reproducible example of the issue, along with information about
platform and OS.
I don't think there's much wrong with is.na(as_date(Inf,
origin='1970-01-01'))==FALSE, as there still is some "non-NA-ness" about the
value (as difftime shows), but that the output when printing is confusing. The
way cat is treating it is clearer: it does print Inf.
So would this be a solution?
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Martin Maechler <
maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
> and a Date vector *is* atomic .. (so I'm confused about what
> that issue is .. but read one.
>
Indeed. I tend to exclude everything with a formal class from "atomic" (eg
factors et al) because they do beha
> Joris Meys
> on Sat, 9 Jun 2018 13:45:21 +0200 writes:
> And now I've seen I copied the wrong part of ?is.na
>> The default method for is.na applied to an atomic vector
>> returns a
> logical vector of the same length as its argument x,
> containing TRUE for thos
